The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has sparked some backlash after a spokesperson for the animal rights organization called the term “pet” derogatory, claiming that it patronizes the animal.
On the daytime television program "Good Morning Britain," Jennifer White of PETA attempted to explain the group’s position on the word “pet,” and suggested it should be switched with “more inclusive” terms like “companion” and “human carer.”
“A lot of people at home who have dogs or cats will call them pets and refer to themselves as owners and this implies that the animals are a possession, like a car for example,” White said on the show.
“When you refer to animals not as the living beings as they are but as an inanimate object, it can reflect our treatment on these animals.”
On the daytime television program "Good Morning Britain," Jennifer White of PETA attempted to explain the group’s position on the word “pet,” and suggested it should be switched with “more inclusive” terms like “companion” and “human carer.” (Photo b
The crux of White’s argument hinged on her belief that referring to an animal as a “pet” creates a “perception” of that animal being disposable — a point she tried backing up with a seemingly non-related point that people who are gifted pets for Christmas return them to shelters by January because “the novelty has worn off.”
Naturally, those appearing alongside White – including "Good Morning Britain" hosts Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid, and publicist Nick Ede – had opinions.
Ede was quick to interrupt White’s point about the dogs being returned quickly after Christmas, claiming it was a problem with “education” not the words that are used.
“You’re trivializing all the work [PETA has] done by basically trying to change a name,” Ede started.
“I am an owner because I bought my dog and I own it,” Ede continued, equating the term “owner” with “ownership” and the idea that to own something means “having some kind of care for something and taking responsibility.”
“I have responsibility for my dog [as an owner],” Ede said.
Those on Twitter seemed to be on the “pet” side of things.
On the other hand, some took issue with how White was treated on the program.
PETA founder and president Ingrid Newkirk further explained the organization's stance in a statement to Fox News.
"Referring to an animal as a 'pet' or as 'it' reduces a sentient being with a personality and emotions to an inanimate object—a possession to be used in any way the 'owner' wishes. Contrary to some reports, we are not seeking to ban these words; we're simply suggesting that it would be more respectful to refer to the animals in our homes as 'animal companions' and ourselves as their 'guardians' in the same way that all social movements concerned with cultivating respect have made appeals to stop using terms that are racist or sexist or that otherwise imply that the subject is less important than the speaker," the statement read.
This stance for PETA, however, is not new. In 2018, PETA was also mocked for trying to change common phrases like “bringing home the bacon” with non-meat ones like “bringing home the bagels,” among others.
“Language is always evolving,” White said during the program.
Get updates on this story on foxnews.com.